Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation
Study problem
What problem was the reputation conducted to resolve?
A look problem identifies an area of concern when a gap exists in the knowledge hireed for nursing practice (Burns & Grove, 2003, p 55). Family presence (FP) during invasive procedures (IPs) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation ( mouth-to-mouth resuscitation) is considered a right, obligation, and natural resultant role by some organizations, notably nursing (Blair, 2004). According to a survey cosponsored by the American necktie of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) and the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) only 5% of U.S. hospitals have written policies on FP during IPs and CPR (Aug 2003). The problem that prompted this study was the need to determine if the presence of family was comforting to the client, distressing to the family members observing the procedure or resuscitation, or awkward for the caregivers and would implementing family presence programs be justifiable (Myers et al., 2000). The article clearly determine the problem that prompted the research.[Good]
Why is the problem an important one for nursing to study?
Nurses have the opportunity to preserve the wholeness, dignity, and integrity of the family unit from redeem to death (Myers et al., 2000). The benefits identified through research will maneuver nursing education and assist nurses with supporting FP during IPs and CPR.
Through FP nurses are given the opportunity to educate families regarding clients conditions and the increased knowledge appropriate to families can help to lower the risk of potential lawsuits.
Study Purpose
What is the advise of the study?
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.